Star Wars first time around |
I
sometimes speak to people – especially young people – who just
don't get Star Wars. It's
not just that they don't particularly like it; it's that they can't
comprehend why it looms so large in the lives of the first generation
of fans.
Up
to a point, I can understand this. We're now 36 years removed from
the first Star Wars.
For a lot of people, the first film has always been there, and many
have seen the sequels, the spin-offs, the imitators, before they've
seen the original.
But
I think there are a number of things that people need to understand
before they can appreciate why Star Wars was such
a big deal.
Star Wars mania: How could you not join in? |
1. Star Wars dominated the culture in a way a film can't today.
It's
possible for a movie today to make much more money than Star
Wars. Plenty have done it. But
I don't think any movie could quite take over the popular imagination
in the way Star Wars did.
You have to remember that this was a
world with fewer TV channels, fewer radio stations, little or no home
video. That meant it was easier for a popular hit in any medium to
attract everybody's attention. It was pretty normal for people who
didn't care much for pop music to know what the number one single
was. Television shows entered the consciousness much more easily;
people even watched shows they didn't like, for lack of alternative.
For
an example, take the sad death in 2009 of Farrah Fawcett. It was a
big deal because Farrah Fawett-Majors (as we knew her in the 1970s)
was one of the biggest stars of her era. You'd have been
hard-pressed to find anyone who didn't know who she was. But her
stardom was really based on being in one season of Charlie's
Angels. Charlie's
Angels – a very popular show,
but it would hardly have made the producers of I, Claudius
think they ought to raise their
game a bit. That's how easily a success in any medium could dominate
the culture.
At
a time when cinema audiences seemed to be in terminal decline, Star
Wars attracted wild enthusiasm
on day one – and the phenomenon snowballed from there. The long
lines waiting to see it fuelled interest from the news media, which
in turn fuelled longer lines, and so on. The character names were
soon common currency, referenced and joked about in other media.
A
contemporary review by Russell Davies of London's Observer,
which I quoted previously in this post,
sums it up: “The man who doesn’t
like Star
Wars puts
himself instantly at the centre of an HM Bateman cartoon. All around
him are raised hands, shocked faces and cries of ‘Shame!’ “
Like
it or not, you couldn't fail to know about Star
Wars.
2.
There was nothing else like Star Wars around.
Young Lady Chatterley: Shall we see that or Star Wars? |
Today,
a fantasy blockbuster comes along pretty much every week. In 1977,
there was nothing like Star
Wars.
The
last big science fiction film had been Logan's
Run in
1976. There had been the Planet
of the Apes cycle,
whose budgets grew smaller along with their box-office receipts until
the series fizzled out in 1973. There had been the
fashionably downbeat, ecologically minded SF movie Silent
Running in
1972. But these were a few isolated examples of SF on the big
screen, and whatever their merits, none of them were big rousing
adventures for all the family. In fact, there was very little to
challenge Disney in the family market.
Take
a look at the films reviewed the same month as Star
Wars in
Britain's Monthly
Film Bulletin: Dead of Night,
The Dirty Half
Dozen,
Emmanuelle and
Francoise,
Equus,
March or Die,
Oh God,
A Portrait of the
Artist as a Young Man,
Pumping Iron,
Rabid,
Shatter,
Valentino,
Welcome to Blood
City and
Young Lady
Chatterley.
As far as family fare was concerned, Star
Wars pretty
much had the field to itself.
3.
Star Wars was unfashionably
optimistic.
It's
easy to forget how downbeat many movies of the 1970s were. There was
a slew of films in which the heroes were not easily distinguished
form the villains and in which endings were at best ambiguous.
Chinatown,
the movie critics tend to rate as the best of the 1970s, is a fine
film, but pretty bleak. One
of the decade's biggest hits, The French Connection,
features as its protagonist a violent, racist, corupt cop, while the
drug-dealing villain is suave and stylish. All very clever, but you
can have too much of that kind of thing.
Beneath the Planet of the Apes nears its cheery ending |
Even the few examples of early 70s science fiction on screen were pretty downbeat. Take a look at how each film in the Planet of the Apes series ended. (SPOILER ALERT, by the way.) I: Our hero discovers he's trapped on a future Earth where nuclear holocaust has put the apes in charge. II: The world ends. III: The characters who time-travelled away from the end of the world get shot to death along with their baby. IV: A violent revolution erupts. Only in V do we get the prospect of an uneasy peace between man and ape. I quite admire the bleakness of those endings, but it's amazing the films were successful.
Silent
Running, meanwhile, had an
almost gratuitously bleak ending (Bruce Dern effectively commits suicide, taking
one of the cute robots with him because it's not much good at
watering plants). At least Logan's Run found
hope among the post-nuclear wasteland.
There
had been some notable exceptions to this gloomy trend – witness the
big success of Rocky in 1976.
But there was clearly a feeling that being downbeat was the same as
being sophisticated.
Then
along came Star Wars.
A movie in which the good guys were good, the bad guys were bad, and
the little band of democratic heroes defeated the evil Empire. No
wonder the public loved it, or that the critics never forgave it.
4.
Star Wars looked and
sounded like nothing else.
We had literally never seen anything
like Star Wars.
There had been some fine special
effects on screen before, but never had there been so many, flitting
by so fast. And never had a film created a series of locales and
characters that were so alien and so exotic. What's more, Star
Wars didn't treat them as exotic. Many of the strangest things
in the film are just discovered matter-of-factly. And the characters
in the movie don't regard them as surprising. Negotiating with a
Jawa or taking care to avoid the Tusken raiders is just a hazard of
life on Tatooine. Robots go wrong and need cleaning. Space travel
is nothing special; it even makes robots ill.
No one in Star Wars thinks sights like this are exotic |
The sheer variety and strangeness of
what was on screen was matched by the soundtrack. Ben Burtt's sound
effects were not the clean electronic noises of other SF films; the
movie was full of real world sounds – motors, heavy machinery,
guttural languages. Even Artoo-Detoo's robot noises sounded organic,
and the TIE fighters emitted a scary barking noise. And then there
was John Williams' score – not the synthesised, self-consciously
'futuristic' music of some science fiction films but a full-blown
19th century romantic symphony. Nobody had made SF like this.
5. Star Wars was more
than you could take in at one viewing.
Star Wars as recreated by John White at StarWarsAge9.com |
There was so much dazzling incident
and detail packed into Star Wars that you could not possibly
appreciate it fully in one viewing. But one viewing is all a lot of
us had.
Yes, many people went back to see the
film again and again. But not everybody could. Today, of course, if
you're knocked out by a film at the cinema, you only have to wait a
few months before you can own a copy forever. But in 1977, there was
no home video, and films took years to appear on television. So
those of us who could not see it again had to recreate the experience
the best we could. We relived it through the novel, the comics, the
Story of Star Wars LP.
This
is one reason I love John White's website Star Wars Age 9 – in which John presents
the comic book adaptation of Star
Wars he created in
1977-78. At age nine, John was doing what so many of us did –
piecing the film together from his own memories and all the sources
he had. The difference is that most of us did it in our imagination;
John did it in pictures, and to a standard most of us could only
dream of.
There's
nothing to stop someone creating a movie just as impressive as Star
Wars today. But it
would be hard for anything to have the same impact. In the 1970s,
the conditions were just right for a great adventure movie to have a
profound effect on millions of young lives.
2 comments:
Star Wars took on a new life in the imagination. It's a bit like: "The pictures are better on the radio."
I wonder if it would have been a good thng for me to be able to pop in a VHS, DVD, BluRay or go to youTube anytime I wanted to watch my favourite film? Or to have the 8mm version which you wrote about previously - and which I desperately dreamt of having?
Maybe I wouldn't have done so much imagining and drawing if I could just watch it.
Maybe I wouldn't have got the soundtrack and had an early, exciting introduction to orchestral music.
Maybe I wouldn't have read Alan Dean Foster's novel with its odd words like "Lambent Topaz".
Maybe I would have tired of it like my son eventually did.
Oh, and thanks for the mention and pic from my comic/webcomic SWa9 Darren ;)
Post a Comment