Trapped in the Tentacles of Doom: the cover of Star Wars Weekly issue 7 |
My occasional, issue-by-issue look at the
The Star Wars Weekly Letters Page
March 22
1978 was the day Star Wars Weekly acquired
a letters page – and, in doing so, introduced readers to other Star Wars fans.
Many of us had fellow fans among our friends
and family, of course. But the letters
page brought it home to us that there were people all over the UK , and beyond,
who spent large amounts of their leisure time thinking about, reading about,
writing about and drawing Star Wars. People from exotic places like Leigh-on-Sea,
Hounslow and Heston.
The first Star Words of the Week in the Star Wars Weekly letters page, by Steve Whatley of Croydon |
The lead
letter on that first page – which won the title 'Star Words of the Week' and earned
its writer a sew-on patch – was from Steve Whatley in Croydon, who critiqued
the art of issue 1, writing that:
"Howard
Chaykin is the perfect compromise between the super-hero and science-fiction
type of illustrations... However, the highlight of the mag was Vindente's work.
Since I first saw his drawings, I've been a great fan of his."
This was a
revelation for me. I don't think I'd thought much before about the artists who
created the strips. I certainly hadn't considered that some people might know
their comics well enough to tell their styles apart and have favourites. (British comics,
unlike those of Marvel and DC, tended not to credit their artists.) Yet here, readers were discussing them as
though they were Da Vinci or Van Gogh. I was learning that both Star Wars and comic books had knowledgeable fans.
The art of Howard Chaykin
Chaykin's art
was damned with feint praise by a couple of other contributors. Peter Elsey of Leigh-on-Sea wrote that
"The art of the Star Wars story
isn't at all good, and I think a different artist should do it. This is just
advice, not criticism." (In which
case, you wouldn't want to be on the end of any criticism from young Mr Elsey.)
Mark Morgan, ofCoventry , praised the comic but said:
"Of course, it has its bad point (as does every comic). In this case, it's
the artwork in the Star Wars strip.
I'm not saying Howard is bad, every Marvel artist is ace, and I mean
that."
Mark Morgan, of
As I've discussed before here, Chaykin's art didn't always look much like the
film, not least because he doesn't seem to have had much idea what the film
would look like when he started drawing.
But the strip had really got into its stride by now, and there was a lot to admire.
In this
issue, we saw Luke almost throttled by the mysterious creature in the Death
Star's garbage masher, in this vivid frame:
We saw Han
and Leia bickering, as in this sequence. I love the last frame here, where the
art conveys exactly the sort of gait Leia is adopting as she stalks off.
While some
of us may occasionally have been frustrated that Chaykin's art did not look
more like the film, a shot-by-shot reproduction of the movie would surely not have
worked.
Chaykin and writer-editor Roy Thomas were, not unreasonably, making the story and the characters more Marvel Comicsy. To this end, they retained lines that were in the novelisation but not in the final version of the script, such as Han's warning that "Getting back to the Falcon's going to be like flying thru the five fire rings of Fornax".
And this installment finishes with some dialogue that would have been too cheesy for the movie but works perfectly in a comic book.
Chaykin and writer-editor Roy Thomas were, not unreasonably, making the story and the characters more Marvel Comicsy. To this end, they retained lines that were in the novelisation but not in the final version of the script, such as Han's warning that "Getting back to the Falcon's going to be like flying thru the five fire rings of Fornax".
And this installment finishes with some dialogue that would have been too cheesy for the movie but works perfectly in a comic book.
"The boys in white are back": Han Solo remains flippant under pressure in Marvel Comics' Star Wars Weekly issue 7 |
Merchandising: Palitoy's Escape from Death Star game and those misspelled Darth Vadar Lives Badges
Win the Star Wars: Escape from Death Star Palitoy board game. A cutting from Star Wars Weekly issue 7 - with the questions missing because I cut out the entry form |
This edition of Star Wars Weekly offered us the chance to win the Star Wars: Escape from Death Star board game, which retailed for £4.25. "The Death Star is a tense board game for 2-4 players, requiring each player to start off from the centre of the Death Star, undertake two dangerous missions, reach the Millenium [sic] Falcon and escape to the Rebel Base in hyperspace," the copy told us.
And for
those who had some cash to part with, the comic offered the chance to acquire a
Star Wars badge or sew-on patch:
'Darth Vadar lives?' The selection of badges and sew-on patches advertised in Star Wars Weekly issue 7 |
Note the spelling on one of those designs: "Darth Vadar lives". In the early days, spellings of Star Wars characters did vary a bit. According to Dale Pollock's biography Skywalking, George's Lucas's secretary Bunny Alsup became so frustrated with Lucas's erratic spelling of character names that she drew up a definitive list. And even in published material from 1977-78, you can find confusion over wookie/wookiee or Jabba the Hutt/Jabba the Hut.
But Darth Vadar instead of Vader? It's a quaint reminder that there was once a world where not everybody knew this stuff.
Did you ever have a letter in Star Wars Weekly? I'd love to hear from anyone who did. Please leave a comment and share your memories.
1 comment:
Hi Darren,
Do you know what was real revelation for me? Reading the letters pages in old US Marvel comics. The Tomb of Dracula ones specifically. Penned by adults, they're usually very intelligent and erudite. So much for 'dumb yanks' - and stupid people who 'read' comics.
Post a Comment